Skip to content

GitLab

  • Menu
Projects Groups Snippets
    • Loading...
  • Help
    • Help
    • Support
    • Community forum
    • Submit feedback
    • Contribute to GitLab
  • Sign in / Register
  • B bloodvitals-tracker1989
  • Project information
    • Project information
    • Activity
    • Labels
    • Members
  • Issues 13
    • Issues 13
    • List
    • Boards
    • Service Desk
    • Milestones
  • Merge requests 0
    • Merge requests 0
  • CI/CD
    • CI/CD
    • Pipelines
    • Jobs
    • Schedules
  • Deployments
    • Deployments
    • Environments
  • Monitor
    • Monitor
    • Incidents
  • Packages & Registries
    • Packages & Registries
    • Package Registry
    • Infrastructure Registry
  • Analytics
    • Analytics
    • Value Stream
  • Wiki
    • Wiki
  • Snippets
    • Snippets
  • Activity
  • Create a new issue
  • Jobs
  • Issue Boards
Collapse sidebar
  • Donna Lovell
  • bloodvitals-tracker1989
  • Issues
  • #12

Closed
Open
Created Aug 15, 2025 by Donna Lovell@donnalovell104Maintainer

The Authors Note Their Study’s Limitations


For most patients, a pulse oximeter is a well-recognized device from visits to the doctor’s office. Placed on a finger or a patient’s ear lobe, pulse oximeters are a straightforward strategy to quickly get a measure of someone’s oxygen saturation (BloodVitals SPO2), BloodVitals SPO2 which ought to usually be above ninety p.c. However the gadget may be contributing to disparities in care based mostly on a patient’s race. For many years, it’s been recognized that pores and skin pigmentation and melanin can have an effect on a pulse oximeter’s means to precisely measure oxygen saturation. A new research, led by investigators at Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (BIDMC), finds evidence that those inaccuracies could also be associated with disparities in care. Researchers discovered that, BloodVitals insights compared to white patients, Black, Hispanic and Asian patients treated within the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) had greater discrepancies between BloodVitals SPO2 ranges detected using pulse oximeters versus ranges detected in blood samples and obtained less supplemental oxygen than white patients. Results are revealed in JAMA Internal Medicine.


"It’s essential to understand that pulse oximeters give us an estimate, but it’s greater than only a quantity. We use that estimate to make clinical choices, equivalent to how much supplemental oxygen to present a patient," said corresponding writer Eric Gottlieb, MD, MS, who accomplished this work whereas a fellow within the Renal Division on the Brigham and in the Laboratory for Computational Physiology (LCP) at MIT. Pulse oximeters measure how a lot mild passes through the skin to supply an estimate of how much oxygen is in a patient’s pink blood cells. Probably the most correct way to measure true blood hemoglobin oxygen saturation levels is by taking a pattern of a patient’s arterial blood, which requires inserting a needle into the radial artery in the wrist or placing in an arterial line - procedures which can be uncomfortable for patients and cannot be executed as repeatedly or BloodVitals insights as easily as taking measurements with a pulse oximeter.


When a affected person has falsely elevated SpO2 readings, they may be at heightened risk for hidden hypoxemia - a situation associated with greater mortality rates and one which occurs at larger incidence amongst racial and ethnic minority patients. To conduct their research, Gottlieb and colleagues used data from the MIMIC-IV critical care dataset, which incorporates essential care knowledge for over 50,000 patients admitted to intensive care items at BIDMC. This dataset contains each pulse oximeter readings and oxygen saturation ranges detected in affected person blood samples for patients within the ICU. The dataset additionally included charges of supplemental oxygen, BloodVitals insights offered by nasal cannula. Greater than 3,000 members had been included within the examine, of whom 2,667 had been white, 207 have been Black, BloodVitals insights 112 had been Hispanic, and 83 were Asian. When the researchers in contrast BloodVitals SPO2 ranges taken by pulse oximeter to oxygen saturation from blood samples, they found that Black, Hispanic and BloodVitals insights Asian patients had larger BloodVitals SPO2 readings than white patients for a given blood oxygen saturation stage. Consequently, Black, Hispanic and Asian patients additionally received decrease rates of supplemental oxygen. The authors word their study’s limitations, together with that their findings are based mostly on information from one establishment, only included patients receiving supplemental oxygen by nasal cannula, and race/ethnicity was self-reported and never assessed by skin tone. Future studies could measure skin tone and oxygen supply more straight and look at other comorbidities and sociodemographic elements that may contribute to disparities.


Posts from this subject shall be added to your every day e-mail digest and your homepage feed. Posts from this topic can be added to your every day electronic mail digest and your homepage feed. Posts from this topic can be added to your each day e-mail digest and your homepage feed. Posts from this writer can be added to your day by day e mail digest and your homepage feed. Posts from this author will be added to your every day email digest and your homepage feed. Five years since the first Apple Watch and a full seven years on from Samsung’s Galaxy Gear, we know what a smartwatch is. We all know that it’s not going to substitute your smartphone anytime soon, that it'll must be charged day by day or two, and that its greatest features are for fitness monitoring and seeing notifications when your cellphone isn’t in your hand. Samsung’s latest smartwatch, the $399-and-up Galaxy Watch 3, doesn't do something to change those expectations.


The truth is, there isn’t a lot difference between the Galaxy Watch 3 and any smartwatch that’s come out prior to now few years - no less than in terms of core functionality. If you’ve managed to disregard or avoid smartwatches for the previous half-decade, the Watch 3 isn’t going to change your mind or win you over. None of that is to say the Galaxy Watch 3 is a nasty smartwatch or even a bad product. On the contrary, the Watch three fulfills the definition and expectations that we’ve accepted for smartwatches completely adequately. It does the issues we count on a smartwatch to do - observe your activity and provide fast access to notifications - simply positive. And if you’re an Android (and even higher, a Samsung) telephone proprietor BloodVitals insights in search of a brand new smartwatch, the Galaxy Watch 3 is a tremendous choose. The Galaxy Watch 3 follows Samsung’s tradition of constructing a smartwatch look just like a traditional watch, full with a spherical face.

Assignee
Assign to
None
Milestone
None
Assign milestone
Time tracking